旅游科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 19-36.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

文化和旅游产业融合发展成效评估研究综述:关系辨识、理论发展与体系重构

张新成1, 高楠1,*, 王琳艳2, 宋晓3   

  1. 1.山西财经大学文化旅游与新闻艺术学院,山西太原 030031;
    2.西安理工大学经济与管理学院,陕西西安 710054;
    3.河南师范大学旅游学院,河南新乡 453007
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-28 修回日期:2023-07-04 出版日期:2023-08-30 发布日期:2023-09-14
  • 通讯作者: *高楠(1982—),男,博士,山西财经大学文化旅游与新闻艺术学院教授,博导,研究方向为旅游目的地运营与管理,E-mail:gaonan0901@163.com。
  • 作者简介:张新成(1992—),男,博士,山西财经大学文化旅游与新闻艺术学院讲师,研究方向为旅游经济运行,E-mail:reddblue123@163.com。王琳艳(1993—),女,西安理工大学经济与管理学院博士生,研究方向为旅游市场开发与规划。宋晓(1988—),女,博士,河南师范大学旅游学院讲师,研究方向为文化旅游和旅游价值共创。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“乡村振兴战略背景下乡村旅游公共服务供给机制创新研究”(19BGL141)

A Review of Cultural and Tourism Industry Integration Development Effectiveness Evaluation:Relation Identification,Theory Development and System Reconstruction

ZHANG Xincheng1, GAO Nan1,*, WANG Linyan2, SONG Xiao3   

  1. 1. School of Culture Tourism and Journalism Arts,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030031, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China;
    3. College of Tourism, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
  • Received:2022-01-28 Revised:2023-07-04 Online:2023-08-30 Published:2023-09-14

摘要: 科学评估文化和旅游产业融合发展成效是正确认知融合发展态势的关键,为推进我国文化和旅游产业融合高质量发展提供理论支撑。文章以“关系辨识-理论发展-体系重构”为逻辑思路,从内涵界定、理论基础、指标体系、评估方法等方面,系统开展研究综述。研究表明:研究者们对文旅融合内涵基本达成共识,且融合发展成效评估研究已有一定基础;评估指标选取呈现由数量型向质量型转变特征,但指标构建仍旧以外显性指标为主;评估方法从单一走向多元;评估尺度具有由“面”向“点”聚焦特征,在因素、动力、模式和机制等研究上,缺少全面兼顾宏观和微观层面结论的有机结合;评估内容则由全面协同向重点领域深化,具体针对产业融合的内部结构、发展效率和竞争能力等方面亟待探讨。对此,文章提出以下展望:(1) 理论融合创新与丰富研究框架;(2) 多维指标创新与彰显融合成效;(3) 关注数字创新与聚焦新兴业态;(4) 融合质量评估与研究范式创新。

关键词: 文化和旅游产业融合, 成效评估, 关系辨识, 理论发展, 体系重构

Abstract: Scientific evaluation of the effectiveness of the integrated development of culture and tourism industry is the key to correctly understand the development trend of integration,and provides theoretical support for promoting the high-quality integrated development of my country’s cultural and tourism industries.This research took “relationship identification-theoretical development-system reconstruction” as the logical idea,and systematically conducted a review from the aspects of connotation definition,theoretical basis,index system,and evaluation methods.The results show that: (1) scholars have basically reached a consensus on the connotation of cultural and tourism integration and researches on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the integrated development of culture and tourism industry have certain foundation;The selection of evaluation indicators shows the characteristics of changing from quantitative to qualitative,but the construction of indicators is still obvious.The evaluation method is from single to multiple;(2) the evaluation scale has the characteristics of focusing from “face” to “point”(3) researches on factors,dynamics,modes and mechanisms lack organic combination of macro and micro-level conclusions;(4) from evaluation content aspect,researches are expected to be deepened from comprehensive coordination to key areas,and the internal structure,development efficiency and competitiveness of industrial integration need to be discussed urgently.In this regard,the paper put forward the following prospects:(1) theoretical integration innovation and improvement of the research framework;(2) multi-dimensional index innovation and demonstration of integration results;(3) focus on digital innovation and new business formats;(4) research paradigm innovation and integration quality research.

Key words: cultural and tourism industry integration, effectiveness evaluation, relation identification, theory development, system reconstruction

中图分类号: 

  • G184

版权所有 © 2018 《旅游科学》编辑部 | 沪ICP备14045560号-1

地址:上海市桂林路100号上海师范大学12号楼211室 | 邮编:200234 | 电话:021-64322594 | Email:lykx@shnu.edu.cn

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发有限公司设计开发