家喻户晓能否门庭若市?“网红城市”旅游形象符号演变与圈层结构研究

旅游科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 75-95.

家喻户晓能否门庭若市?“网红城市”旅游形象符号演变与圈层结构研究

陆宇彤^1,2, 黄燕玲^1,3,*, 黄毅¹, 姚建盛¹, 冯义杰¹, 毛甜雨¹

1.桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院, 广西桂林 541004;
2.澳门旅游大学, 澳门 999078;
3.桂林理工大学漓江保护与发展研究院, 广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2022-10-27 修回日期:2024-03-04 出版日期:2024-06-30 发布日期:2024-07-08
通讯作者: ^*黄燕玲（1976—）,女,桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院教授,博导,研究方向为旅游心理与行为、旅游产业与数字经济,E-mail：527277452@qq.com。
作者简介:陆宇彤（1997—）,女,桂林理工大学硕士生, Email：shengxi219@126.com。黄毅（1981—）,男,博士,桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院助理研究员,研究方向为旅游经济地理、旅游计量经济。姚建盛（1980—）,男,博士,桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院副教授,研究方向为智慧旅游、旅游时空大数据挖掘。冯义杰（1997—）,男,桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院硕士生。毛甜雨（1996—）,女,桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院硕士生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“西南民族旅游地‘主客'网络交互行为特征与影响机理研究”（72064007）; 国家自然科学基金项目“历史文化街区类景区游客移动微观模型与仿真研究”（72162011）; 广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目“基于‘主客'交互的目的地旅游形象演变及‘网红'标签构建”（YCSW2022305）

Whether Well-Known Attractions Drive People to Visit? Research on the Evolution of Tourism Image Semiotics and Circle Structure of “Internet-Famous City”

LU Yutong^1,2, HUANG Yanling^1,3,*, HUANG Yi¹, YAO Jiansheng¹, FENG Yijie¹, MAO Tianyu¹

1. College of Tourism and Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;
2. Macao University of Tourism, Macao 999078, China;
3. Institute of Protection and Development of the Li River, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Received:2022-10-27 Revised:2024-03-04 Online:2024-06-30 Published:2024-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 社交媒体影响与日俱增,旅游城市形象传播路径与内容日益多元化。文章从符号学视角出发,基于“主-客”视角,运用LDA主题模型对“需求方”——典型“网红城市”（重庆）2012—2021年游客网络游记进行分析,结合“供给方”——旅游城市官方发文与热点事件,探究旅游目的地形象传播与旅游者感知热度变化的关系,提出并解析“核心层-中间层-边缘层”旅游符号圈结构。研究发现：“网红城市”旅游符号可分为参与体验、观光游览、文化知识、情感4种类型,参与体验型与观光游览型旅游符号游客感知热度较高;“网红城市”形象传播主要通过影视、综艺等媒介与明星/网红同款打卡驱使旅游者产生网络亚文化行为（“网红打卡”）并吸引潜在消费群体;在“核心层-中间层-边缘层”旅游符号圈结构中,观光游览型与文化知识型旅游符号主要分布于核心层与中间层,参与体验型旅游符号处于中间层和边缘层,情感型旅游符号位于边缘层与核心层。其中,边缘层旅游符号更能有效激发旅游者关注与认同,是旅游城市形象优化的重点路径。

关键词: 旅游符号, 关注热度, 符号圈, TF-IDF, LDA, 目的地形象

Abstract: The influence of social media is increasing, and the channels and contents of tourism city image communication are becoming increasingly diversified. From a semiotic perspective, this article used the LDA topic model to analyze Chongqing's travelogue data from 2012 to 2021 on the “demand side”, combined with the official publications and hot events of tourist cities on the “supply side” to explore the relationship between destination image communication and the change in tourists' perceived enthusiasm. This study also proposed and analyzed the tourism semiosphere structure of “core layer, middle layer, and edge layer”. The results show that: 1) The tourism symbols of “Internet celebrity cities” can be divided into four categories: experiential tourism symbol, sightseeing tourism symbol, cultural knowledge tourism symbol, and emotional tourism symbol. Experiential tourism symbol and sightseeing tourism symbol tourists have higher perceived enthusiasm. 2) The image communication of an “internet-famous city” is mainly generated through media symbols and action symbols, which lead to the creation of tourists' online subcultural behavior and attract potential consumers. 3) In the tourism semiosphere structure of “core layer, middle layer, and edge layer”, the categories of sightseeing and cultural knowledge tourism symbols are mainly distributed in the core and middle layers, the categories of experiential tourism symbol is in the middle and edge layers, and the emotional tourism symbol is in the edge and core layers. Among them, the edge layer tourism symbol can more effectively stimulate tourists' attention and recognition, which is the key path to optimize the image of tourism cities.

Key words: tourism semiotics, attention fever, semiosphere, TF-IDF, LDA, destination image

中图分类号:

F590.8

陆宇彤, 黄燕玲, 黄毅, 姚建盛, 冯义杰, 毛甜雨. 家喻户晓能否门庭若市?“网红城市”旅游形象符号演变与圈层结构研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2024, 38(6): 75-95.

LU Yutong, HUANG Yanling, HUANG Yi, YAO Jiansheng, FENG Yijie, MAO Tianyu. Whether Well-Known Attractions Drive People to Visit? Research on the Evolution of Tourism Image Semiotics and Circle Structure of “Internet-Famous City”[J]. TOURISM SCIENCE, 2024, 38(6): 75-95.

参考文献

[1] 陈岗,黄震方,2010.旅游景观形成与演变机制的符号学解释——兼议符号学视角下的旅游城市化与旅游商业化现象[J].人文地理(5):124-127.
[2] 陈雅,2008.地方文化符号系统的建构与创新[J].青海社会科学(3):18-21.
[3] 董爽,汪秋菊,2019.基于LDA的游客感知维度识别:研究框架与实证研究——以国家矿山公园为例[J].北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)(2):42-49.
[4] 董引引,曲颖,2022.感官刺激如何激发情感?多感官旅游体验对目的地依恋的持续性影响机制[J].旅游科学(2):101-121.
[5] 冯雪红,向锦程,张梦尧,2019.青海藏区石刻的流动及其社会文化意义变迁——一个三江源生态移民村的个案考察[J].民族研究(2):75-87;141.
[6] 黄细嘉,李雪瑞,2011.我国旅游资源分类与评价方法对比研究[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)(2):96-100.
[7] 黄燕,赵振斌,褚玉杰,张铖,2015.互联网时代的旅游地视觉表征:多元建构与循环[J].旅游学刊(6):91-101.
[8] 黄震方,祝晔,袁林旺,等,2011.休闲旅游资源的内涵、分类与评价——以江苏省常州市为例[J].地理研究(9):1543-1553.
[9] 蒋翠清,吕孝忠,段锐,2019.基于主题模型的产品在线论坛主题演化分析[J].系统工程学报(5):598-609.
[10] 姜奕村,2022.皮尔士符号分类与演变理论之解读与修正[J].江苏社会科学(2):214-223.
[11] 晋秀龙,钱坤,2018.旅游符号视角下琅琊山风景区旅游册设计[J].包装工程(24):340-346.
[12] 康澄,2006.文化符号学的空间阐释——尤里·洛特曼的符号圈理论研究[J].外国文学评论(2):100-108.
[13] 李仁杰,郭风华,安颖,2011.近十年北京环城游憩地类型与空间结构特征研究[J].人文地理(1):118-122.
[14] 刘雨潇,张建国,2021.基于凝视理论的村落景区旅游形象投射与感知比较研究——以浙江杭州天目月乡为例[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版)(5):18-26.
[15] 吕连琴,陈天玉,2020.旅游目的地宣传形象与游客感知形象对比研究——以河南省为例[J].地域研究与开发(6):98-102;107.
[16] 马耀峰,2013.旅游资源开发及管理(第三版)[M].天津:南开大学出版社.
[17] 马颖,2017.文化符号圈构建与文化产品创新途径初探——以河洛文化圈为例[J].中华文化论坛(11):70-74.
[18] 梅琼林,2006.符号消费构建消费文化——浅论鲍德里亚的符号批判理论[J].学术论坛(2):181-183;187.
[19] 曲颖,董引引,2021.“官方投射形象——游客目的地依恋”网络机制对比分析——以海南重游驱动为背景[J].南开管理评论(5):73-85.
[20] 宋河有,2022.红色文化旅游符号培育:基因挖掘、氛围营造与产业带动[J].理论月刊(11):93-102.
[21] 孙玲玲,胡彦蓉,刘洪久,2021.基于LSTM-LDA算法和IPA分析的在线品牌社群用户关注热点研究[J].情报杂志(9):178-186.
[22] 谈佳洁,刘新静,2021.符号学视角下旅游吸引物的短视频内容传播逻辑——定性比较分析(QCA)[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(3):34-44.
[23] 王保成,刘利军,黄青松,2022.基于LDA和卷积神经网络的半监督图像标注方法[J].计算机工程与科学(1):110-117.
[24] 王伟,高宁,徐玉婷,等,2021.基于LDA的众筹项目在线评论主题动态演化分析[J].数据分析与知识发现(10):103-123.
[25] 王小英,2022.短视频文艺:文艺大众化的符号构筑与接受[J].南京社会科学(9):131-139;155.
[26] 王钰宁,孙九霞,2022.旅游跨文化学习中的主客互动——阳朔太极拳的教与学[J].人文地理(4):175-181.
[27] 王振坡,王欣雅,张安琪,等,2020.基于搜索引擎关注度的城市符号演变特征研究——以天津为例[J].城市发展研究(2):37;111-117.
[28] 魏宝祥,欧阳正宇,2007.影视旅游:旅游目的地营销推广新方式[J].旅游学刊(12):32-39.
[29] 姚新涛,曾坚,吴鼎,2020.湘西山地生态旅游资源空间结构特征研究[J].中国农业资源与区划(5):246-256.
[30] 杨桂华,2010.旅游资源与开发[M].昆明:云南大学出版社.
[31] 杨振之,邹积艺,2006.旅游的“符号化”与符号化旅游——对旅游及旅游开发的符号学审视[J].旅游学刊(5):75-79.
[32] 张高军,杨双梦,柯景怡,等,2020.OGC和TGC照片中的目的地形象分异与合和——试论旅游形象的线上传播链[J].旅游学刊(12):52-62.
[33] 张杰,2012.基于文化符号圈理论的太极拳文化符号结构研究[J].体育科学(12):85-92.
[34] 张文力,严永红,2021.转型期中国城市夜景照明的空间生产过程与机制——以重庆市为例[J].资源开发与市场(6):692-697.
[35] AREFIEVA V,EGGER R,YU J,2021.A machine learning approach to cluster destination image on Instagram[J].Tourism management,85(4):104318.
[36] BRUNI L E,2015.Sustainability,cognitive technologies and the digital semiosphere[J].International journal of cultural studies,18(1):103-117.
[37] DE SAUSSURE F,1989.Cours de linguistique générale[M].Wiesbaden:Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.
[38] ECHTNER C M,1999.The semiotic paradigm:implications for tourism research[J].Tourism management,20(1):47-57.
[39] FRANCESCONI S,2011.Images and writing in tourist brochures[J].Journal of tourism and cultural change,9(4):341-356.
[40] FRANCESCONI S,2017.Dynamic intersemiosis as a humour-enacting trigger in a tourist video[J].Visual communication,16(4):395-425.
[41] GROSSPIETSCH M,2006.Perceived and projected images of Rwanda:visitor and international tour operator perspectives[J].Tourism management,27(2):225-234.
[42] GUO Y,BARNES S J,JIA Q,2017.Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews:tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation[J].Tourism management,59(2):467-483.
[43] KUHZADY S,GHASEMI V,2019.Pictorial analysis of the projected destination image:portugal on instagram[J].Tourism analysis,24(1):43-54.
[44] LAGOPOULOS A PH,2009.The social semiotics of space:metaphor,ideology,and political economy[J].Semiotica,173(1):169-213.
[45] LOTMAN Y M,2005.On the semiosphere[J].Sign systems studies,33(1):205-229.
[46] METRO-ROLAND M,2009.Interpreting meaning:an application of Peircean semiotics to tourism[J].Tourism geographies,11(2):270-279.
[47] MICK D G,1986.Consumer research and semiotics:exploring the morphology of signs,symbols,and significance[J].Journal of consumer research,13(2):196-213.
[48] NDALIANIS A,2015.Genre,culture and the semiosphere:new horror cinema and post-9/11[J].International journal of cultural studies,18(1):135-151.
[49] PALMER C,1999.Tourism and the symbols of identity[J].Tourism management,20(3):313-321.
[50] PARASKEVAIDIS P,WEIDENFELD A,2021.Perceived and projected authenticity of visitor attractions as signs:a Peircean semiotic analysis[J].Journal of destination marketing & management,19(1):100515.
[51] PENNINGTON J W,THOMSEN R C,2010.A semiotic model of destination representations applied to cultural and heritage tourism marketing[J].Scandinavian journal of hospitality and tourism,10(1):33-53.
[52] PEIRCE C S,1991.Peirce on signs:writings on semiotic[M].North Carolina:The University of North Carolina Press.
[53] REMM T,2011.Understanding the city through its semiotic spatialities[J].Sign systems studies,39(2-4):124-144.
[54] ROY N,GRETZEL U,2022.Feeling opulent:adding an affective dimension to symbolic consumption of themes[J].Tourism geographies,24(2-3):346-368.
[55] RÜDISSER J,SCHIRPKE U,TAPPEINER U,2019.Symbolic entities in the European Alps:perception and use of a cultural ecosystem service[J].Ecosystem services,39(5):100980.
[56] SANG S,2021.Reconstructing the place branding model from the perspective of Peircean semiotics[J].Annals of tourism research,89(4):103209.
[57] STEPCHENKOVA S,ZHAN F,2013.Visual destination images of Peru:comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography[J].Tourism management,36(3):590-601.
[58] STONE P R,GREBENAR A,2022.‘Making Tragic Places':dark tourism,kitsch and the commodification of atrocity[J].Journal of tourism and cultural change,20(4):457-474.
[59] TEGTMEYER L L,2016.Tourism aesthetics in ruinscapes:bargaining cultural and monetary values of Detroit's negative image[J].Tourist studies,16(4):462-477.
[60] TRESIDDER R,2010.What no pasties！?reading the cornish tourism brochure[J].Journal of travel & tourism marketing,27(6):596-611.
[61] URRY J,LARSEN J,2011.The tourist gaze 3.0[M].London:Sage Publications Ltd.
[62] YE Z,JEON H-Y,2023.Chinese city brands and semiotic image scales:a tourism perspective[J].Social semiotics,33(1):1-24.
[63] ZHANG X,SHENG J,2017.A Peircean semiotic interpretation of a social sign[J].Annals of tourism research,64(3):163-173.