数字时代的“老有所乐”：互联网使用与城市老年人休闲生活质量

旅游科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 37-55.

数字时代的“老有所乐”：互联网使用与城市老年人休闲生活质量

吕宁^1,2, 徐玲玲¹, 朱志胜^1,2,*

1.北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院, 北京 100024;
2.北京旅游发展研究基地, 北京 100024

收稿日期:2023-07-02 修回日期:2024-07-05 出版日期:2024-07-30 发布日期:2024-08-14
通讯作者: 朱志胜^*（1986—）,男,博士,北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院副教授,研究方向为旅游经济与政策评估、旅游发展与人力资本积累、旅游就业与消费促进等,E-mail：20170061@bisu.edu.cn。
作者简介:吕宁（1980—）,女,博士,北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院教授,研究方向为旅游宏观经济研究与产业规划、休闲经济学、休闲城市学等,E-mail：18227047@qq.com。徐玲玲（2000—）,女,北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院硕士生。
基金资助:
北京社会科学基金决策咨询重点项目“北京文化和旅游融合市场主体能力体系建设研究”（21JCB034）; 2022年度北京市属高校优秀青年人才培育计划“旅游发展驱动人力资本红利：理论机制、效应评估与政策优化”（BPHR202203149）; 2023年度北京第二外国语学院校级科研专项项目“文旅产业赋能国际消费中心城市建设的驱动机制与实现路径研究”（KYZX23A020）

"Pleasured the Elderly" in the Digital Age：Internet Use and Urban Elderly’s Leisure Life Quality

LV Ning^1,2, XU Lingling¹, ZHU Zhisheng^1,2,*

1. School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024, China;
2. Research Center of Beijing Tourism Development, Beijing 100024, China

Received:2023-07-02 Revised:2024-07-05 Online:2024-07-30 Published:2024-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 更高质量的休闲生活是积极老龄化战略的重要议题,也是衡量老年群体健康福祉的关键指标。文章利用2018年中国综合社会调查数据,基于网络增益效应的理论视角,实证检验了互联网使用对城市老年人休闲生活质量的影响及其作用机制。研究发现,目前我国城市老年人的休闲活动可归结为成就型、怡情型、娱乐型、闲散型4种基本类型,且以娱乐型和闲散型为主。互联网使用显著提高了城市老年人的休闲生活质量,使用互联网的城市老年人拥有更高的休闲频率与更多的休闲品类,并且互联网使用显著提高了老年群体参与成就型与怡情型等发展型的休闲活动。社会资本在互联网使用与城市老年人休闲生活质量的影响关系中具有中介作用。互联网使用通过提高城市老年人的社会资本进而促进休闲生活质量的提升。异质性分析结果表明,互联网使用对城市老年人休闲生活质量的促进作用存在显著的异质性,来自东部地区及相对低龄和低经济社会地位的城市老年人从互联网使用中获得了更高质量的休闲生活。研究成果对深入推进积极老龄化战略和开发老年休闲消费市场均具有重要借鉴价值。

关键词: 互联网使用, 休闲生活质量, 老年人, 社会资本, 积极老龄化

Abstract: Achieving a better quality of leisure life is an important issue in promoting active aging strategies and a key indicator for measuring the health and well-being of older people. Based on the data of China General Social Survey 2018 (CGSS2018) and the theoretical perspective of network gain effect, this paper empirically tested the impact of Internet use on leisure life quality of urban elderly and its mechanism. It is found that the leisure activities of the urban elderly in our country can be summarized into four basic types: "achievement", "pleasant", "entertainment" and "idleness", among which "entertainment" and "idleness" types are the main ones. The use of the Internet significantly improves the quality of leisure life of the urban elderly. The urban elderly who use the Internet have higher leisure frequency and more leisure types, and the use of the Internet significantly improves their participation in developmental leisure activities such as "achievement" type and "pleasant" type. Social capital has an intermediary role in the relationship between the influence of the Internet use and the leisure life quality of the urban elderly, and the Internet use promotes the improvement of the leisure life quality by improving the social capital of the urban elderly.The results of heterogeneity analysis showed that there was significant heterogeneity in the promotion effect of Internet use on the leisure life quality of the urban elderly, and the urban elderly from the eastern region and relatively young and low socio-economic status obtained a higher quality of leisure life from Internet use. The research findings of this paper have important reference value for further promoting the active aging strategy and the development of the elderly leisure consumption market.

Key words: Internet use, leisure life quality, elderly, social capital, active aging

中图分类号:

C924.24

吕宁, 徐玲玲, 朱志胜. 数字时代的“老有所乐”：互联网使用与城市老年人休闲生活质量[J]. 旅游科学, 2024, 38(7): 37-55.

LV Ning, XU Lingling, ZHU Zhisheng. "Pleasured the Elderly" in the Digital Age：Internet Use and Urban Elderly’s Leisure Life Quality[J]. TOURISM SCIENCE, 2024, 38(7): 37-55.

参考文献

[1] 杜鹏,汪斌,2020.互联网使用如何影响中国老年人生活满意度?[J].人口研究(4):3-17.
[2] 封铁英,刘蓉,高鑫,2020.人际关系、活动参与与老年人主观幸福感——基于陕西省养老机构调查实例的分析[J].中州学刊(3):87-91.
[3] 封铁英,刘嫄,2022.数字时代互联网使用对老年人主观阶层认同的影响研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)(2):122-131.
[4] 何志玉,2018.新时代人民美好休闲生活及意义[J].贵州社会科学(12):9-15.
[5] 胡卉宇,文吉,林珊珊,等,2021.未来时间洞察力与旅游意向的关系研究——以成功老龄化群体为例[J].旅游学刊(4):31-45.
[6] 胡荣,黄倩雯,2019.社会资本、休闲方式与老年人的心理健康[J].湖南社会科学(1):51-58.
[7] 李贵成,2014.休闲:理解生活质量的一个重要视角[J].河南社会科学(6):105-109.
[8] 李慧娟,李彦,2015.从线下到线上:移动互联网的时空分区效应研究[J].国际新闻界(10):18-36.
[9] 李婕妤,王璋,2023.三孩政策下城市青年生育偏好与生育计划[J].南方人口(3):53-67.
[10] 廖小平,孙欢,2010.休闲及其类型:一种文化哲学的视角[J].河南社会科学(6):144-148.
[11] 刘松,楼嘉军,2017.休闲生活方式:国外研究述评与启示[J].宁夏社会科学(3):118-124.
[12] 刘文学,2016.社会参与是“积极老龄化”的精髓和核心[J].中国人大(18):32.
[13] 吕宁,韩霄,2019.中国休闲城市发展报告(2019)[M].北京:旅游教育出版社.
[14] 彭可余,宋月萍,2024.互联网使用与老年人就业收入:数字资本的视角[J].人口学刊(4):67-85.
[15] 彭希哲,吕明阳,陆蒙华,2019.使用互联网会让老年人感到更幸福吗?——来自CGSS数据的实证研究[J].南京社会科学(10):57-68.
[16] 宋瑞,2006.休闲与生活质量关系的量化考察:国外研究进展及启示[J].旅游学刊(12):48-52.
[17] 王丽,原新,2016.家庭子女数量和性别结构对老年人休闲生活影响的研究[J].南方人口(2):71-80.
[18] 王世强,郭凯林,吕万刚,2021.互联网使用会促进我国老年人体育锻炼吗?——基于CGSS数据的实证分析[J].体育学研究(5):62-70.
[19] 吴悦芳,徐红罡,2022.幸福在他处:退休流动者的深度休闲与心理幸福感[J].旅游学刊(6):69-78.
[20] 邢占军,王从,2021.生活质量视角下的文化养老研究与政策思考[J].理论学刊(6):140-146.
[21] 杨菊华,2019.智慧康养:概念、挑战与对策[J].社会科学辑刊(5):102-111.
[22] 杨菊华,刘轶锋,2022.数字时代的长寿红利:老年人数字生活中的可行能力与内生动力[J].行政管理改革(1):26-36.
[23] 叶闽慎,2019.主客观生活质量作用机制研究:基于中介效应分析[J].湖北社会科学(4):42-53.
[24] ÁBRAHÁM J,VELENCZEI A,SZABO A,2012.Perceived determinants of well-being and enjoyment level of leisure activities[J].Leisure sciences,34(3):199-216.
[25] BEARD J G,RAGHEB M G,2018.Measuring leisure satisfaction[J].Journal of leisure research,12(1):20-33.
[26] BETTI G,SOLDI R,TALEV I,2016.Fuzzy multidimensional indicators of quality of life:the empirical case of macedonia[J].Social indicators research,127(1):39-53.
[27] BLOOM J,KOMPIER M,GEURTS S,et al.,2009.Do we recover from vacation?Meta-analysis of vacation effects on health and well-being[J].Journal of occupational health,51(1):13-25.
[28] CHI C G,QU H,2008.Examining the structural relationships of destination image,tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty:an integrated approach[J].Tourism management,29(4):624-636.
[29] FUNG H H,CARSTENSEN L L,2006.Goals change when life's fragility is primed:lessons learned from older adults,the september 11 attacks and SARS[J].Social cognition,24(3):248-278.
[30] GARD M,DIONIGI R A,HORTON S,et al.,2017.The normalization of sport for older people?[J].Annals of leisure research,20(3):253-272.
[31] KIM J,RASOULI S,TIMMERMANS H J P,2017.Social networks,social influence and activity-travel behaviour:a review of models and empirical evidence[J].Transport reviews,38(4):499-523.
[32] KING M F,RENÓ V F,NOVO E M L M,2014.The concept,dimensions and methods of assessment of human well-being within a socioecological context:a literature review[J].Social indicators research,116(3):681-698.
[33] KUOPPAMÄKI S,TAIPALE S,WILSKA T,2017.The use of mobile technology for online shopping and entertainment among older adults in finland[J].Telematics and informatics,34(4):110-117.
[34] LESTARI S K,DE LUNA X,ERIKSSON M,et al.,2021.A longitudinal study on social support,social participation,and older europeans’quality of life[J].SSM - population health,13:100747.
[35] MOORE S C,PATEL A V,MATTHEWS C E,et al.,2012.Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality:a large pooled cohort analysis[J].PLOS medicine,9(11):1001335.
[36] NÄSI M,RÄSÄNEN P,SARPILA O,2012.Ict activity in later life:Internet use and leisure activities amongst senior citizens in Finland[J].European journal of ageing,9(2):169-176.
[37] NEVES B B,FRANZ R L,MUNTEANU C,et al.,2018.Adoption and feasibility of a communication app to enhance social connectedness amongst frail institutionalized oldest old:an embedded case study[J].Information,communication & society,21(11):1681-1699.
[38] NIMROD G,ADONI H,2012.Conceptualizing e-leisure[J].Loisir et société society and leisure,35(1):31-56.
[39] PAILLARD-BORG S,WANG H,WINBLAD B,et al.,2009.Pattern of participation in leisure activities among older people in relation to their health conditions and contextual factors:a survey in a Swedish urban area[J].Ageing and society,29(5):803-821.
[40] PÉNARD T,POUSSING N,2014.Internet use and social capital:the strength of virtual ties[J].Journal of economic issues,44(3):569-595.
[41] POP R,SĂPLĂCAN Z,DABIJA D,et al.,2022.The impact of social media influencers on travel decisions:the role of trust in consumer decision journey[J].Current issues in tourism,25(5):823-843.
[42] QUAN-HAASE A,MO G Y,WELLMAN B,2017.Connected seniors:how older adults in east york exchange social support online and offline[J].Information, communication & society,20(7):967-983.
[43] RÄSÄNEN P,KOUVO A,2007.Linked or divided by the web?Internet use and sociability in four European countries[J].Information, communication & society,10(2):219-241.
[44] ROBINSON J P,2011.Arts and leisure participation among it users[J].Social science computer review,29(4):470-480.
[45] RODRÍGUEZ A,LÁTKOVÁ P,SUN Y,2007.The relationship between leisure and life satisfaction: application of activity and need theory[J].Social indicators research,86(1):163-175.
[46] ROJAS M,MÉNDEZ A,WATKINS-FASSLER K,2023.The hierarchy of needs empirical examination of Maslow’s theory and lessons for development[J].World development,165:106185.
[47] RUSSELL R V,2018.The importance of recreation satisfaction and activity participation to the life satisfaction of age-segregated retirees[J].Journal of leisure research,19(4):273-283.
[48] SANETRA-SZELIGA J,2022.Culture and heritage as a means to foster quality of life?The case of Wrocław European Capital of Culture 2016[J].European planning studies,30(3):514-533.
[49] SANTACREU M,BUSTILLOS A,FERNANDEZ-BALLESTEROS R,2016.Multidimensional/multisystems/multinature indicators of quality of life:cross-cultural evidence from Mexico and Spain[J].Social indicators research,126(2):467-482.
[50] STORMANN W F,1993.The recreation profession,capital and democracy[J].Leisure sciences,15(1):49-66.
[51] SU S,SHI L,ZHENG Y, et al.,2022.Leisure activities and the risk of dementia a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Neurology,99(15):1651-1663.
[52] TSVETKOVA M,MACY M W,2014.The social contagion of generosity[J].PLOS one,9(2):87275.
[53] WAGNER N,HASSANEIN K,HEAD M,2010.Computer use by older adults:a multi-disciplinary review[J].Computers in human behavior,26(5):870-882.
[54] YU J,MOCK S E,SMALE B,2021.The role of health beliefs in moderating the relationship between leisure participation and wellbeing among older Chinese adults[J].Leisure studies,40(6):764-778.
[55] ZHANG C,QING N,ZHANG S,2021.The impact of leisure activities on the mental health of older adults:the mediating effect of social support and perceived stress[J].Journal of healthcare engineering,12(1):1-11.
[56] ZHOU R,FONG P S W,TAN P,2014.Internet use and its impact on engagement in leisure activities in China[J].PLOS one,9(2):89598.
[57] ZILKA G C,2019.The digital divide:implications for the e-safety of children and adolescents[J].International journal of technology enhanced learning,11(1):20.