旅游型海岛生态系统服务供需与岛民福祉研究——以长山群岛为例

旅游科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 135-159.

旅游型海岛生态系统服务供需与岛民福祉研究——以长山群岛为例

赵娜^1,2, 王辉^1,*, 论宇超¹, 李盼¹

1.辽宁师范大学地理科学学院,辽宁大连 116029;
2.呼伦贝尔职业技术学院商贸旅游系,内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021000

收稿日期:2023-09-11 修回日期:2025-01-09 出版日期:2025-01-30 发布日期:2025-04-09
通讯作者: 王辉^*（1975—）,女,博士,辽宁师范大学地理科学学院教授,博导,研究方向为海岛旅游、国家公园,E-mail：wanghuiouki@126.com。
作者简介:赵娜（1988—）,女,辽宁师范大学地理科学学院博士生,研究方向为生态旅游、海岛旅游,E-mail：ml8004097681@163.com。论宇超（1995—）,男,辽宁师范大学地理科学学院博士生,研究方向为海洋海岛旅游。李盼（1998—）,女,辽宁师范大学地理科学学院硕士生。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"海岛休闲经济高质量发展的模式、路径与案例研究"（22JJD790031）; 辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般项目"海岛乡村活力特征及驱动机制研究"（JYTMS20231065）

Study on Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services and Islanders Well-being in Tourism Islands：A Case of Changshan Archipelago

ZHAO Na^1,2, WANG Hui^1,*, LUN Yuchao¹, LI Pan¹

1. School of Geography, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China;
2. Department of Business and Tourism, Hulunber Vocational and Technical College, Hulunber 021000, China

Received:2023-09-11 Revised:2025-01-09 Online:2025-01-30 Published:2025-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 推动海岛绿色发展与提升岛民福祉水平是促进海岛可持续发展的必要举措。文章基于生态系统服务供需与人类福祉耦合协调发展逻辑框架,运用耦合协调、脱钩弹性及多元回归模型对长山群岛供需与福祉耦合协调发展时空特征及影响因素进行分析。结果为：（1）长山群岛生态系统服务供需关系有所缓和,未来供需关系盈余量增加;獐子岛供需关系最为紧张,海洋岛供需盈余最为丰裕。（2）长山群岛岛民综合福祉、基本生活、健康与安全以及精神福祉均由低水平发展为中等水平,未来各类福祉将发展为较高或高水平;小长山岛、大长山岛综合福祉水平分别为最高和最低,海洋岛基本生活福祉水平最高,广鹿岛健康与安全福祉水平最高,獐子岛精神福祉水平最高。（3）长山群岛生态系统服务供需与岛民福祉耦合协调度由基本协调发展为优质协调,二者脱钩趋势减弱,未来优质协调程度更为明显,并且二者处于增长连接状态;小长山岛耦合协调度最高,大长山岛耦合协调度最低,大长山岛、小长山岛、广鹿岛和海洋岛脱钩状态为强脱钩,獐子岛处于增长连接状态。（4）调节供需关系对长山群岛生态系统服务供需与岛民福祉耦合协调发展产生直接和间接影响。（5）结合耦合协调度影响因素及“长板”“短板”,从7个方面优化海岛自然生态系统和社会经济系统协调发展路径。

关键词: 旅游型海岛, 生态系统服务, 生态系统服务供需, 人类福祉, 长山群岛

Abstract: Promoting the green development of islands and improving the well-being of islanders are necessary measures to promote the sustainable development of islands. Based on the logical framework of the coupling and coordinated development of ecosystem service supply and demand and human welfare, this paper used the coupling and coordination model, decoupling elasticity model and multiple regression model to analyze the spatial and temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the coupling and coordinated development of ecosystem service supply and welfare in Changshan Archipelago. The results are as follows: (1) The relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services in Changshan Archipelago is alleviated, and the surplus of future supply and demand relationship is increased. The relationship between supply and demand of Zhangzi Island is the most intense, and the surplus of supply and demand of Haiyang Island is the most abundant. (2) The overall well-being, basic living, health and safety, and spiritual well-being of the Changshan Archipelago have all progressed from a low level to a medium level, and all types of well-being will develop to a relatively high or high level in the future.The comprehensive well-being level of Xiaochangshan Island and Dachangshan Island is the highest and the lowest respectively, the basic well-being level of Haiyang Island is the highest, the health and safety well-being level of Guanglu Island is the highest, and the spiritual well-being level of Zhangzi Island is the highest. (3) The coupling coordination degree of ecosystem service supply and demand and islander well-being in Changshan Archipelago developed from basic coordination to high-quality coordination, the decoupling trend of the two was weakened, and the degree of high-quality coordination will be more obvious in the future, and the two were in a state of growth connection. The coupling coordination degree of Xiaochangshan Island is the highest, the coupling coordination degree of Dachangshan Island was the lowest, the decoupling state of Dachangshan Island, Xiaochangshan Island, Guanglu Island and Haiyang Island is strong decoupling, and Zhangzi Island was in the state of increasing connection. (4) The adjustment of supply and demand relationship has direct and indirect effects on the coupling and coordinated development of ecosystem service supply and demand and islander well-being in Changshan Archipelago. (5) The coordinated development path of natural ecosystem and social and economic system of islands can be optimized from seven aspects by combining the influencing factors of coupling coordination degree and "long board" and "short board".

Key words: tourism-type island, ecosystem service, ecosystem service supply and demand, human well-being, Changshan Archipelago

中图分类号:

F592.7

赵娜, 王辉, 论宇超, 李盼. 旅游型海岛生态系统服务供需与岛民福祉研究——以长山群岛为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2025, 39(1): 135-159.

ZHAO Na, WANG Hui, LUN Yuchao, LI Pan. Study on Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services and Islanders Well-being in Tourism Islands：A Case of Changshan Archipelago[J]. TOURISM SCIENCE, 2025, 39(1): 135-159.

参考文献

[1] 曹威威,孙才志,杨璇业,等,2020.基于能值生态足迹的长山群岛人地关系分析[J].生态学报(1):89-99.
[2] 董孝斌,刘梦雪,2022.土地利用/覆盖变化-生态系统服务-人类福祉关系研究进展[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)(3):465-475.
[3] 黄娟,杜燕然,万崇良,2019.试论健康中国与美丽中国的关系[J].创新(6):55-62.
[4] 刘晓青,2022.人与自然关系视域下美丽中国与健康中国的统一性探析[J].岭南学刊(4):111-115.
[5] 李权,2022.我国资源型城市经济与环境协同发展机理及实现路径研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学.
[6] 郦天昳,彭建,刘焱序,等,2017.基于集对分析的区域生态文化健康评价:以云南省大理白族自治州为例[J].地理科学进展(10):1270-1280.
[7] 李咏华,高欣芸,姚松,等,2022.长三角城市群核心地区碳平衡压力与新型城镇化脱钩关系[J].经济地理(12):72-81.
[8] 刘浩,2021.三峡库区生态系统服务与农村居民福祉的时空协调发展研究——以万州区为例[D].重庆:重庆工商大学.
[9] 马琳,刘浩,彭建,等,2017.生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J].地理学报(7):1277-1289.
[10] 秦伟山,孙剑锋,张义丰,等,2017.中国县级海岛经济体脆弱性综合评价及空间分异研究[J].资源科学(9):1692-1701.
[11] 邱坚坚,刘毅华,陈澄静,等,2023.生态系统服务与人类福祉耦合的空间格局及其驱动方式——以广州市为例[J].自然资源学报(3):760-778.
[12] 邱坚坚,刘毅华,袁利,等,2021.人地系统耦合下生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展(6):1060-1072.
[13] 申嘉澍,李双成,梁泽,等,2021.生态系统服务供需关系研究进展与趋势展望[J].自然资源学报(8):1909-1922.
[14] 苏飞,张平宇,2010.基于集对分析的大庆市经济系统脆弱性评价[J].地理学报(4):454-464.
[15] 王大尚,郑华,欧阳志云,2013.生态系统服务供给、消费与人类福祉的关系[J].应用生态学报(6):1747-1753.
[16] 王群,陆林,杨兴柱,2015.千岛湖社会-生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J].地理学报(5):779-795.
[17] 王圣云,2011.福祉地理学——中国区域发展不平衡研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社.
[18] 王泽宇,郭萌雨,孙才志,等,2015.基于可变模糊识别模型的现代海洋产业发展水平评价[J].资源科学(3):534-545.
[19] 温忠麟.张雷,侯杰泰,等,2004.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报(5):614-620.
[20] 习近平,2017.习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M].北京:外文出版社.
[21] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等,2003.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报(2):189-196.
[22] 熊鹰,侯珂伦,郑偲睿,等,2020.基于结构方程模型的南方丘陵山地农户福祉与生态系统服务关系——以广东省乐昌市为例[J].热带地理(5):843-855.
[23] 许爱景,2011.高等教育投入与经济增长的计量和耦合协调分析——基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究[J].山东财政学院学报(5):73-79.
[24] 许萌,2021.西北干旱区城市生态系统服务供需与居民福祉的关联[D].北京:中国地质大学.
[25] 严岩,朱捷缘,吴钢,等,2017.生态系统服务需求、供给和消费研究进展[J].生态学报(8):2489-2496.
[26] 易丹,肖善才,韩逸,等,2021.生态系统服务供给和需求研究评述及框架体系构建[J].应用生态学报(11):3942-3952.
[27] 张蓬涛,刘双嘉,周智,等,2021.京津冀地区生态系统服务供需测度及时空演变[J].生态学报(9):3354-3367.
[28] 张晓云,吕宪国,沈松平,2009.若尔盖高原湿地生态系统服务价值动态[J].应用生态学报(5):1147-1152.
[29] 赵士洞,张永民,2006.生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望[J].地球科学进展(9):895-902.
[30] 赵文武,刘月,冯强,等,2018.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J].地理科学进展(1):139-151.
[31] 赵兴军,娄峰,2022.城乡流通一体化与居民消费的耦合协调分析[J].商业经济研究(17):46-50.
[32] 赵艳,2017.农村土地流转、城乡收入差异和新型城镇化耦合协调性发展研究[J].世界农业(12):142-147.
[33] 郑虎,2013.旅游型海岛资源环境脆弱性研究[D].泉州:华侨大学.
[34] 周新宇,孟士婷,黄庆旭,等,2022.结合生态系统服务供需和人类福祉的区域规划[J].生态学报(14):5748-5760.
[35] BARÓ F,PALOMO I,ZULIAN G,et al.,2016.Mapping ecosystem service capacity,flow and demand for landscape and urban planning:a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region[J].Land use policy,57:405-417.
[36] BURKHARD B,KROLL F,NEDKOV S,et al.,2012.Mapping ecosystem service supply,demand and budgets[J].Ecological indicators,21(10):17-29.
[37] ENGELBRECHT H,2009.Natural capital,subjective well-being,and the new welfare economics of sustainability:some evidence from cross-country regressions[J].Ecological economics,69(2):380-388.
[38] GRANGER C W J,1980.Testing for causality:a personal viewpoint[J].Journal of economic dynamics and control,2(1):329-352.
[39] HAQ R,2009.Measuring human wellbeing in Pakistan:objective versus subjective indicators[J].MPRA paper,9(3):516-532.
[40] LEIGH A,WOLFERS J,2006.Happiness and the human development index:Australia is not a paradox[J].Australian economic review,39(2):176-184.
[41] MACKINNON D,2008.Introduction to statistical mediation analysis[M].Mahwah,NJ:Earlbaum.
[42] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment,2003.Ecosystems and human well-being:a framework for assessment[M].Washington D C,USA:Island Press.
[43] MIN J,CHONG J,WHC D,et al.,2022.Quantifying the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services and identifying its spatial determinants:a case study of ecosystem restoration hotspot in Southwest China[J/OL].Ecological engineering,174:106472.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106472.
[44] MOUCHET M A,LAMARQUE P,LOPEZ B M,et al.,2014.An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services[J].Global environmental change,28(9):298-308.
[45] OSWALD A J,WU S,2010.Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being:evidence from the U.S.A.[J].Science,327(5965):576-579.
[46] RAUDSEPP-HEARNE C,PETERSON G D,TENGÖ M,et al.,2010.Untangling the environmentalist's paradox:why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?[J].Bioscience,60(8):576-589.
[47] SUMMERS J K,SMITH L M,CASE J L,et al.,2012.A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services[J].Ambio,41(4):327-340.
[48] VILLAMAGNA A M,ANGERMEIER P L,BENNETT E M,2013.Capacity,pressure,demand,and flow:a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery[J].Ecological complexity,15(9):114-121.
[49] WU J,2013.Landscape sustainability science:ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes[J].Landscape ecology,28:999-1023.