长江经济带旅游生态韧性与效率协同效应及空间特征分析

旅游科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 1-23.

• 旅游经济 • 下一篇

长江经济带旅游生态韧性与效率协同效应及空间特征分析

李志远¹, 冯学钢^1,*, 夏赞才², 牛菁莹²

1.华东师范大学经济与管理学院,上海 200062;
2.湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南长沙 410081

收稿日期:2022-08-18 修回日期:2023-12-12 发布日期:2024-04-07
通讯作者: ^* 冯学钢（1962—）,男,博士,华东师范大学经济与管理学院教授,博导,研究方向为文旅融合发展,E-mail：xgfeng@bs.ecnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:李志远（1997—）,男,华东师范大学经济与管理学院博士生,研究方向为旅游可持续发展、区域旅游经济,E-mail：452502984@qq.com。夏赞才（1962—）,男,博士,湖南师范大学旅游学院教授,博导,研究方向为旅游伦理。牛菁莹（1996—）,女,湖南师范大学旅游学院硕士生。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“文化和旅游融合发展市场主体建设研究”（19ZD25）; 湖南省社会科学基金重大委托项目“新时代湖南文化与旅游一体化发展战略”（19WTA11）

Synergy Effect and Spatial Characteristics Analysis of Tourism Ecological Resilience and Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

LI Zhiyuan¹, FENG Xuegang^1,*, XIA Zancai², NIU Jingying²

1. School of Economics and management Administration, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200000, China;
2. Tourism College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Received:2022-08-18 Revised:2023-12-12 Published:2024-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 韧性与效率是可持续发展的两个核心议题,促进旅游生态韧性与效率深度协同,是长江经济带旅游业高质量发展与生态文明建设的应有之义。文章以2010—2019年长江经济带11个省（市）为研究对象,在构建旅游生态韧性与效率评价指标体系并测度其水平的基础上,运用哈肯模型探究二者的协同效应,并分析其动态演化态势及空间分布特征,结果表明：（1）研究期内,长江经济带整体旅游生态效率水平较高,是主导协同演化的序参量,区域旅游生态韧性有待提升。东部地区属于旅游生态韧性与效率“双高”地区,但下滑趋势明显;西部地区旅游生态韧性与效率均有显著提升;中部地区属于旅游生态韧性与效率“洼地”。（2）长江经济带旅游生态韧性与效率整体协同水平呈现向优质协同发展的趋势。江苏省、上海市、贵州省、四川省属于优质协同区域;湖北省、湖南省、安徽省属于系统失调区域。（3）随时间推移,优质协同地区对周边地区的虹吸效应在降低,区域协同水平呈现出“东部>西部>中部”到“东、西双核突出”再到“西部超越”的空间演化格局。（4）旅游生态韧性与效率存在复杂的竞合关系,三大地区也面临不同的协同困境,其中,东部地区旅游发展新动能不足,中部地区旅游生态系统存在低水平趋同式发展的困境,西部地区需解决旅游业内部发展差距大的弊端。

关键词: 旅游生态韧性, 旅游生态效率, 协同水平, 空间特征, 哈肯模型, 长江经济带

Abstract: Resilience and efficiency are the two core issues of sustainable development.Promoting the deep synergy between tourism ecological resilience and efficiency is essential for the high-quality tourism development and the construction of ecological civilization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.This paper took 11 provinces （cities） in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2010 to 2019 as the entry point,based on the construction of tourism ecological resilience and efficiency evaluation index system and the measurement of their level,the Haken model was used to explore the synergistic effect,and its dynamic evolution and spatial distribution characteristics were further analyzed.The results show that：（1） During the study period,the overall tourism ecological efficiency level of the Yangtze River Economic Belt is relatively high,which is the order parameter leading the synergy,and the regional tourism ecological resilience needs to be improved.The eastern region belongs to the “double high” area of tourism ecological resilience and efficiency,but the downward trend is obvious.The resilience and efficiency of tourism ecology in western China have improved significantly.The central region belongs to the “depression” of tourism ecological resilience and efficiency.（2） The overall synergy level of tourism ecological resilience and efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt shows a trend of high-quality synergetic development.Jiangsu Province,Shanghai,Guizhou Province and Sichuan Province belong to the high-quality synergetic area.Hubei Province,Hunan Province and Anhui Province belong to the regions of system disorder.（3） As time goes by,the siphon effect of high-quality synergetic areas on the surrounding areas decreases,and the regional synergetic level presents a spatial evolution pattern of “East>West>central” to “dual-core prominence in the east and west” and then to “western transcendence”.（4） There is a complex competition and cooperation relationship between tourism ecological resilience and efficiency,and the three regions are facing different synergy difficulties.The eastern region is facing the dilemma of insufficient new driving force for tourism development,the central region is facing the deficiency of low level convergence of tourism ecosystem development,and the western region needs to solve the disadvantages of large development gap in tourism industry.

Key words: tourism ecological resilience, tourism ecological efficiency, level of synergy, spatial characteristics, haken model, Yangtze River Economic Belt

中图分类号:

F592.7

李志远, 冯学钢, 夏赞才, 牛菁莹. 长江经济带旅游生态韧性与效率协同效应及空间特征分析[J]. 旅游科学, 2024, 38(3): 1-23.

LI Zhiyuan, FENG Xuegang, XIA Zancai, NIU Jingying. Synergy Effect and Spatial Characteristics Analysis of Tourism Ecological Resilience and Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. TOURISM SCIENCE, 2024, 38(3): 1-23.

参考文献

[1] 车磊,白永平,周亮,等,2018.中国绿色发展效率的空间特征及溢出分析[J].地理科学(11):1788-1798.
[2] 陈长坤,陈以琴,施波,等,2018.雨洪灾害情境下城市韧性评估模型[J].中国安全科学学报(4):1-6.
[3] 陈辉,李双成,郑度,2005.基于人工神经网络的青藏公路铁路沿线生态系统风险研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版)(4):586-593.
[4] 陈绍晴,房德琳,陈彬,2015.基于信息网络模型的生态风险评价[J].生态学报(7):2227-2233.
[5] 狄乾斌,赵晓曼,王敏,2020.基于非期望产出的中国滨海旅游生态效率评价——以我国沿海城市为例[J].海洋通报(2):160-168.
[6] 郭丽佳,李畅,彭红松,等,2021.节能减排约束下中国省域旅游生态效率评估及空间格局研究[J].地理科学进展(8):1284-1297.
[7] 韩增林,朱文超,李博,2022.中国海洋渔业经济韧性与效率协同演化研究[J].地理研究(2):406-419.
[8] 胡美娟,丁正山,李在军,等,2020.生态效率视角下旅游业生态福利及驱动因素——以常州市为例[J].生态学报(6):1944-1955.
[9] 李志远,夏赞才,2021.长江经济带旅游业高质量发展水平测度及失配度时空格局探究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版)(4):33-42.
[10] 马勇,李丽霞,任洁,2017.神农架林区旅游经济-交通状况-生态环境协调发展研究[J].经济地理(10):215-220;227.
[11] 孙才志,孟程程,2020.中国区域水资源系统韧性与效率的发展协调关系评价[J].地理科学(12):2094-2104.
[12] 孙阳,张落成,姚士谋,2017.基于社会生态系统视角的长三角地级城市韧性度评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境(8):151-158.
[13] 王兆峰,陈青青,2021.1998年以来长江经济带旅游生态安全时空格局演化及趋势预测[J].生态学报(1):320-332.
[14] 王兆峰,刘庆芳,2019.长江经济带旅游生态效率时空演变及其与旅游经济互动响应[J].自然资源学报(9):1945-1961.
[15] 夏赞才,李志远,2020.旅游资源、收入与客流的空间错位分析——以四川省为例[J].经济论坛(4):87-94.
[16] 熊晓炼,樊健,2022.金融科技与制造业绿色转型协同演化机制及区域协同差异——基于哈肯模型的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策(11):63-73.
[17] 燕连福,赵建斌,毛丽霞,2021.习近平生态文明思想的核心内涵、建设指向和实现路径[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)(1):1-9.
[18] 杨秀平,贾云婷,翁钢民,等,2020.城市旅游环境系统韧性的系统动力学研究——以兰州市为例[J].旅游科学(2):23-40.
[19] 姚治国,陈田,2016.旅游生态效率研究进展[J].旅游科学(6):74-91.
[20] 查建平,戴家权,刘珂吉,等,2022.旅游增长与碳排放脱钩状态及其驱动因素研究——一个新的脱钩分析框架[J].旅游学刊(4):13-24.
[21] 张宾宾,2016.影响江西省旅游大发展的主要问题及其对策研究[D].南昌:南昌大学.
[22] 章锦河,张捷,梁玥琳,等,2005.九寨沟旅游生态足迹与生态补偿分析[J].自然资源学报(5):735-744.
[23] 张帅,赵小曼,杨健全,等,2020.城市要素聚集能力评价及耦合协调度研究——以陕西省为例[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版)(4):23-30.
[24] 郑兵云,杨宏丰,2020.基于生态足迹的中国省际旅游生态效率时空演化[J].华东经济管理(4):79-91.
[25] BURRITT R L,SAKA C,2006.Environmental management accounting applications and eco-efficiency:case studies from Japan[J].Journal of cleaner production,14(14):1262-1275.
[26] COLDING J,2007.‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems[J].Landscape and urban planning,81(1-2):46-55.
[27] CÔTÉ R,BOOTH A,LOUIS B,2006.Eco-efficiency and SMEs in nova scotia,Canada[J].Journal of cleaner production,14(6):542-550.
[28] FUCHS M,2004.Strategy development in tourism destinations:a DEA approach[J].Poznań university of economics review,4(1):52-73.
[29] GÖSSLING S,PEETERS P,CERON J P,et al.,2005.The eco-efficiency of tourism[J].Ecological economics,54(4):417-434.
[30] GUNDERSON L H,2000.Ecological resilience—in theory and application[J].Annual review of ecology and systematics,31(1):425-439.
[31] HOLLING C S,1973.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual review of ecology and systematics,4(1):1-23.
[32] JABAREEN Y,2013.Planning the resilient city:concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk[J].Cities,31:220-229.
[33] KUO N W,CHEN P H,2009.Quantifying energy use,carbon dioxide emission,and other environmental loads from island tourism based on a life cycle assessment approach[J].Journal of cleaner production,17(15):1324-1330.
[34] KYTZIA S,WALZ A,WEGMANN M,2011.How can tourism use land more efficiently?A model-based approach to land-use efficiency for tourist destinations[J].Tourism management,32(3):629-640.
[35] LI Y,SHI Y,QURESHI S,et al.,2014.Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface[J].Ecological indicators,42(1):135-146.
[36] MEDINA L F,GÓMEZ I G,MARRERO S M,2012.Measuring efficiency of sun and beach tourism destinations[J].Annals of tourism research,39(2):1248-1251.
[37] MIHALIČ T,2000.Environmental management of a tourist destination:a factor of tourism competitiveness[J].Tourism management,21(1): 65-78.
[38] NIAVIS S,TSIOTAS D,2019.Assessing the tourism performance of the Mediterranean coastal destinations:a combined efficiency and effectiveness approach[J].Journal of destination marketing and management,14:100379.
[39] RENALD A,TJIPTOHERIJANTO P,SUGANDA E,et al.,2016.Toward resilient and sustainable city adaptation model for flood disaster prone city:case study of Jakarta Capital Region[J].Procedia-social and behavioral Sciences,227:334-340.
[40] RESCIA A J,WILLAARTS B A,SCHMITZ M F,et al.,2010.Changes in land uses and management in two nature reserves in Spain:evaluating the social-ecological resilience of cultural landscapes[J]. Landscape and urban planning,98(1):26-35.
[41] SCHALTEGGER S,BURRITT R,2000.Contemporary environmental accounting:issues,concepts and practice[M].Sheffield:Greenleaf Publishing.
[42] STIGSON B,2001.A road to sustainable industry:how to promote resource efficiency in companies [R].Dsseldorf:World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
[43] VAN BERKEL R,2007.Eco-efficiency in the Australian minerals processing sector[J].Journal of cleaner production,15(8-9):772-781.

长江经济带旅游生态韧性与效率协同效应及空间特征分析

Synergy Effect and Spatial Characteristics Analysis of Tourism Ecological Resilience and Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王凯, 邹楠, 甘畅, 胡奕. 区域一体化政策能否促进城市旅游发展?——基于长江经济带的实证检验[J]. 旅游科学, 2023, 37(2): 40-59.
[2]	史甜甜, 关燕琴, 翁时秀. 中国5A级旅游景区微信公众号功能建设水平空间特征研究[J]. 旅游科学, 2021, 35(3): 100-119.
[3]	许春晓, 黎巧. 长株潭红色旅游共生发展的空间特征[J]. 旅游科学, 2015, 29(2): 14-27.
[4]	肖建红1于爱芬2王敏1. 旅游过程碳足迹评估——以舟山群岛为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2011, 25(4): 58-66.